Sunday, May 29, 2011

Rush: Why You Need and Love the Rat Race by Todd Buchholz


Rush employs the latest research in neuroscience and behavioral economics to argue that it is the rat race itself -- sloppy, risky, and tense -- that can bring us happiness. It is the very pursuit of love, new knowledge, money, and status that literally delivers a RUSH, lights up our brains, releases dopamine and ignites our passion.
Author, Todd Buchholz, humorously reveals the nature of human competition, exposing the links between competition, high performance, a higher standard or living, and a heightened sense of happiness.

There is no perfect performance from yourself to be happy.  Only to know that everything rounds off itself and to know that true happiness and find your own eden.  Whether you're going to the bowling alley or spending your time in finance or yoga, you need that rush to be happy.  People need to feel like they are a part of something and there is no better way then to immerse yourself in competition or in with other people. There are many facts and philosphies from an assortment of people from different walks in life about their need for the rat race.   Buchholz is witty and knowledgeable in his subject matter that will keep you turning the pages.

I believe that anxiety is the key to your gains or your losses in life.  It's the key to everything; the things you learn and the mistakes you make.  It's a rush and it will make you think about how things apply to your own life.

Todd on Twitter

Todd G. Buchholz, author of Rush: Why You Need and Love the Rat Race is a former White House director of economic policy, award-winning teacher at Harvard, managing director of the Tiger hedge fund, and was a fellow at Cambridge University in 2009. He is also a founder of Two Oceans Management, as well as coproducer of the Tony Awardwinning Broadway hit Jersey Boys. A regular contributor to NPR'sMarketplace, he appears monthly on PBS's Nightly Business Report and his book New Ideas from Dead Economists is used in universities throughout the world. Buchholz has also written for the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and Reader's Digest. He lives with his wife and daughters in Southern California.


As Interest Rates Fall, Civilizations Rise

By Todd G. Buchholz,

Author of Rush: Why You Need and Love the Rat Race

As an economist, the best measure of time I can find is the prevailing interest rate. When interest rates are high, it tells us that tomorrow counts for less. It is not worth investing today. From a business point of view, very few financed projects will payoff if interest rates are high (the "hurdle rate"). However, when interest rates are low, it tells us that we should invest today because any return will be prized more in the future. During the German hyperinflation of the early 1920s, prices and interest rates jumped higher each hour. The price of a cup of coffee could go up as the waitress was pouring. Teachers got paid at ten a.m. and brought their banknotes to the playground so their relatives could pick them up and then buy things immediately. Likewise, the hyperinflation of Zimbabwe in recent years acted like a neutron bomb on the economy. Coincidentally, in 1919, when Yeats wrote "things fall apart; the centre cannot hold," interest rates were jumping sharply, the British pound slid in value, and Europe was preparing for a terrible bout of post-World War I inflation. Elsewhere, I set out "the Buchholz Hypothesis," arguing that the crime rate is importantly a function of interest rates. This solves the puzzle of the Great Depression. Most commentators on crime say that a lousy economy leads to crime. But during the Great Depression, crime rates fell, as they did in 2008 and 2009. Why? Because interest rates fell, too. People did not give up on tomorrow, even as they suffered economic distress.

If you charted interest rates over the past two thousand years, you'd mostly see a decline. Certainly the advent of banks and enforceable legal contracts have played a huge role. Mostly, though, interest rates have declined because life has become more secure (thanks, in part, to contracts). If your shop looks like it will catch fire tomorrow because bandits will come pillaging through town, lenders will not trust that you will pay them back.

Simply comparing interest rates from Bronze Age Sumer to ancient Greece shows a sharp drop, from 20 percent to 10 percent. From ancient Greek civilization through the ancient Roman civilization rates declined a bit further. Historians have uncovered the accounts of the Temple at Delos from the second century BC. The temple took in money through offerings from pilgrims and from visiting monarchs from Macedon, Egypt, and Pergamum. The temple did not have a modern vault; it kept the funds in jars, and then lent them out to property buyers. For a five-year mortgage, the temple would charge 10 percent. In case of default, the temple could seize the property of the borrower, according to a well-defined contract. Medieval Europe enjoyed falling rates from about AD 1250 to roughly the time of Darwin. Shakespeare would have gotten better terms than Chaucer, and Dickens better terms than Shakespeare. Ironically, Shakespeare set the bitter moneylending of The Merchant of Venice in Italy, where interest rates dipped to nearly half of English levels. Bassanio would have gotten worse terms in London.

Competitive societies do a better job of setting interest rates than noncompetitive societies. Interest rates depend on a whole set of purely economic factors, such as inflation and the quantity of money in circulation. But they also rest on the competitive quest for credit. Businesses and entrepreneurs show up at the bank or at the bond market with their plans and spreadsheets, trying to persuade lenders that they have a better plan and prospect for profitability than everybody else. When a couple buying a new home applies for a mortgage they are (unknowingly) arguing that they are a better credit risk than alternative borrowers. A credit-rating system is a competitive system. Not everyone or every business presents the same credit risk. That's why IBM can borrow at 3 percent, but the MGM Mirage gaming and hotel company might issue a junk bond at 11 percent. In 2010, as Mediterranean governments shuddered with bankruptcy fears, Greece had to pay 20 percent for money it promised to repay in two years, while Germany could sell ten-year bonds at just 2.5 percent. That's why you might loan $5,000 to your neighbor and not even $100 to your nephew carrying the skateboard under his arm. If we cut out the competition for credit -- if we made sure everyone could borrow on the same terms -- we'd punish the economy, discourage lending, and set back our hopes for progress in this world.

Regardless of specific differences in interest rates, this point stands: Societies that make tomorrow more appealing show more progress. And not just material, GDP-measured progress. They also show less bloodshed and longer lives. We all know the cliche used when we send an urgent package: "time is of the essence." Well, it turns out that time is of the essence of human progress. Either we imagine progress and move forward, or we sink into entropy and the center does not hold.

The above is an excerpt from the book Rush:Why You Need and Love the Rat Race by Todd G. Buchholz. The above excerpt is a digitally scanned reproduction of text from print. Although this excerpt has been proofread, occasional errors may appear due to the scanning process. Please refer to the finished book for accuracy.

Copyright © 2011 Todd G. Buchholz, author of Rush: Why You Need and Love the Rat Race

No comments:

Post a Comment

The old grey donkey, Eeyore stood by himself in a thistly corner of the Forest, his front feet well apart, his head on one side, and thought about things. Sometimes he thought sadly to himself, "Why?" and sometimes he thought, "Wherefore?" and sometimes he thought, "Inasmuch as which?" and sometimes he didn't quite know what he was thinking about.

Thank you for taking time out of your day to leave a comment. It's appreciated.